Pokemon TCG Pocket's Trading Feature Faces Backlash, Prompts Developer Response

DeNA, the developer of Pokemon TCG Pocket, has pledged improvements to the game's recently implemented trading feature following significant player criticism. The controversy centers around the perceived high cost and restrictive nature of the system.

High Cost of Trade Tokens Fuels Player Frustration

Introduced on January 29th, 2025, the trading feature allows exchanges of 1-4 Diamond and 1-Star rarity cards from Genetic Apex and Mythical Island booster packs. While welcomed by players aiming for Pokedex completion, the limitations – specifically the restricted card selection, the introduction of a new in-game currency (trade tokens), and the steep cost of trading – sparked widespread discontent.

DeNA acknowledged the negative feedback, stating they are actively working on solutions. A key change will involve providing alternative methods of acquiring trade tokens, including event distributions. Currently, obtaining tokens necessitates sacrificing higher-rarity cards, creating an inefficient and potentially costly process. For example, trading a 4-Diamond card requires 500 tokens, while selling a 1-Star card yields only 100.

DeNA justified the initial restrictions as a measure to prevent bot abuse and multi-account exploitation, emphasizing their commitment to a fair and enjoyable card-collecting experience.

Genetic Apex Booster Pack Availability Concerns

The release of the Space-Time Smackdown booster packs on January 29th, 2025, also generated player concerns. Some players reported the disappearance of the Genetic Apex packs from the main screen. While this was due to a less-than-obvious pack selection option, the small and easily missed text caused significant confusion and frustration.

While the issue stems from poor UI design, some players suspected a deliberate attempt to promote the newer packs. Suggestions for improving the home screen to display all available booster packs have been made, aiming to prevent similar misunderstandings in the future. DeNA has not yet addressed this specific issue directly.